Hey, Ya Know What?

Thursday, March 17, 2005

I'm at a place called Vertigo

Well, I promised a provocative U2 post. Day before yesterday, yours truly caused a global stir. Literally. I belong to a large worldwide Worship mailing list. It's an active list and there are folks from every continent posting to it. I am fairly active on the list, and rarely let something go by that like what you are about to read.

First worship band in rock and roll hall of fame IMHO

That was the post that piqued my attention and caused me to reply with the following:

I have always been a huge U2 fan, but I think the worship band description is a bit of a stretch. I understand how some might come to that description though. One of the band's biggest problems is what makes it tough for me to call them a worship band. Over the years, Bono, has been his own biggest fan. On the one hand, he can seem very down to earth and unassuming. Then all of the sudden, he is the total self absorbed rock star. After the Actung Baby album we were given Zooropa and Pop. Wow, he started to believe the press clippings and thought he could do anything. The last 5 years or so though they do seem to be seeking again, and I think that is great. The past two albums, especially the most recent, have been fantastic and they are back to doing the kind of music their fans grew to expect. I think we should be careful how we treat a band like this. Much of their music is seeking and longing. They know there is something more, but haven't given over to it totally. And that doesn't make them evil. I still have more of myself to give over. But it's a little out there to call them a worship band. It's been very trendy for Christians in tune with the post-modern world we live in to 'sing their praises'. Anyway, one humble opinion was already given and I gave mine. Don't know if it was humble tho. ;) (waiting to be blasted now. at least, that is what happened the last time )

I had many replies on the list. A few were supportive, but others disagreed on at least a point or two. It was interesting that most were upset I'd have anything bad to say about some of their music (when I mention the travesty that was Zooropa and Pop). To which I itched badly to ask the folks who they were worshipping. (I didn't tho) I guess I just find this one of the things that bugs me about post-modern/emergent Christian groups. Some stuff that doesn't deserve a pass, gets one. Pastor Kerry sent a very good article the other day and this situation made me think of that article.

4 Comments:

  • Vertigo - U2 (continuing my string of getting the easy ones).

    Your post made me think of something that a friend of mine told me a few years ago. If I remember correctly, he had bought a U2 album and had either returned it or considered returning it because he said the last four songs on it were sacreligious. I don't remember which album it was, but it seems to me like he said that Johnny Cash sang on it. I don't know any more about it than that, and I never looked up the lyrics to the songs in question myself. Does anyone have any thoughts on that or know what he might have been referring to?

    One more U2 thought - some of my friends like to argue with me Huey Lewis and The News are a "greater" band than U2.

    By Brent, at 11:32 AM  

  • That is the Zooropa album you are talking about. The one with "Lemon" and "Numb". The Johnny Cash appearance was on "The Wanderer". It had a line that went.

    I stopped outside a church house
    Where the citizens like to sit
    They say they want the kingdom
    But they don't want God in it

    That is not sacreligious. Too many times, it's all too true.

    The song Dirty Days was about Judas, if memory serves me, but nothing sacreligious. And I can't think of anything else on the album that might have been.

    Folks in our area of the country are really touchy about how people talk about God and things of God. So it's very easy for us to initially thing something is sacreligious when it isn't. I've fallen into that trap many times and wrote an artist off. Then I look at what they said, and realize that the point they are making is not a bad one at all. There was a time in my life when the above lyrics would have made think they were saying something bad.

    Huey Lewis and the News, I love 'em. But they ain't better. By a long shot.

    By Rich, at 12:17 PM  

  • Rich...
    Dead on the money with the U2 comments.

    Also, the more I ponder the lyric in question, the more I realize its a statement of mans's failure rather than an attack on God.

    One more thing...its not even possible to make a legitimate comparison between Huey Lewis & the News and U2. Their music is so divergent, any comparison is unfair...the old "apples and oranges" thing. U2 is gritty and real. HLN is just darn good, fun rock 'n roll. I can't imagine rock music without either of them.

    To sum it all up, I want a new drug, but I still haven't found what I'm looking for.

    By Duane, at 8:37 AM  

  • Duane, good points on the two bands in question. It really is apples and oranges. I like them both a lot.

    By Rich, at 9:05 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home